Abstract
AbstractWater scarcity and accessibility remain persistently amongst the most prominent global challenges. Although there is a wide agreement among international organizations that Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) and water governance are key to overcome water-related challenges, global assessments of the progress made by cities is lacking. This paper for the first time analyses the challenges of water, wastewater, municipal solid waste and climate change in cities. We used empirical studies (125 cities) based on the City Blueprint Approach and developed a statistical estimation model to estimate IWRM performances of another 75 cities. These 200 cities in total represent more than 95% of the global urban population. This comprehensive global picture enables us to evaluate the existing gaps in achieving water-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) and SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities). The best performing cities were Amsterdam and Singapore. Unfortunately, most cities do not yet manage their water resources wisely and are far from achieving the SDGs. For instance, targets regarding drinking water supply are still a challenge for many cities in Africa and Asia and challenges regarding sanitation are high in cities in Africa, Asia and Latin America. The same holds for solid waste management, climate adaptation, and people living in informal settlements. In another paper we will address the solution pathways to these global challenges.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference48 articles.
1. Aartsen M, Koop SHA, Hegger DLT, Goswami B, Oost J, Van Leeuwen CJ (2018) Towards meaningful science-policy interaction: Lessons from a systematic water governance analysis in the city of Ahmedabad. India. Reg Environ Change 18(8):2445–2457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1363-1
2. Alvarez VV, Buchauer K (2015) East Asia and Pacific - Wastewater to energy processes: a technical note for utility managers in EAP countries, Report No: ACS13221, World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/489941468188683153/pdf/ACS13221-v1-Revised-Box393171B-PUBLIC-Wastewater-to-Energy-Report-Main-Report.pdf. Accessed Feb 2022
3. Beisheim M, Campe S (2012) Transnational public–private partnerships’ performance in water governance: Institutional design matters. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 30(4):627–642. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1194
4. Casiano Flores C, Özerol G, Bressers H, Kuks S, Edelenbos J, Gleason A (2019) The state as a stimulator of wastewater treatment policy: a comparative assessment of three subnational cases in central Mexico. J Environ Policy Plan 21(2):134–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1566060
5. Chang I-S, Zhao M, Chen Y, Guo X, Zhu Y, Wu J, Yuan T (2020) Evaluation of the integrated water resources management in China’s major cities – based on the City Blueprint Approach. J Clean Prod 262:121419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121410
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献