Follicular steroidogenesis in random start protocols for oocyte cryopreservation

Author:

Galati GiuliaORCID,Somigliana Edgardo,Ciaffaglione Marta,Reschini Marco,Serra Nicole,Sanzani Elena,Viganò Paola,Polledri Elisa,Fustinoni Silvia,Muzii Ludovico,Filippi Francesca

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Random start protocols are commonly used for oocyte cryopreservation in women with cancer. However, albeit generally reassuring, available evidence is still insufficient to rule out a sub-optimal cycle outcome. This study aimed to compare follicular steroidogenesis between women initiating the random start protocol in the luteal phase and those initiating in the follicular phase. Methods Consecutive women with cancer scheduled for oocyte cryostorage were prospectively recruited. We excluded those requiring a concomitant letrozole assumption. All women received a standardized protocol with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. At the time of oocyte retrieval, follicular fluids were pooled, and a sample was collected and frozen at −80 °C. All samples were assayed concomitantly after thawing by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The concentration of 15 different steroid hormones was determined. Results Seventy-one women were recruited. Thirty-three initiated the ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase, while the remaining 38 initiated in the follicular phase. Baseline characteristics were generally similar. Cycle outcome did also not differ; the median (interquartile range) number of frozen mature oocytes was 9 (5–14) and 10 (5–21), respectively (p = 0.42). None of the 15 tested steroid hormones differed. Conclusions The endocrine microenvironment surrounding oocytes is not markedly influenced by the phase of the menstrual cycle at the initiation of ovarian stimulation. This result further supports the validity of random start protocols.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Developmental Biology,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Genetics,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3