Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
AI and its machine learning algorithms have proven useful in several fields of medicine, including medically assisted reproduction. The purpose of the study was to construct several predictive models based on clinical data and select the best models to predict IUI procedure outcomes.
Methods
Clinical data (patient baseline characteristics, sperm quality, hormonal status, and cycle data) from 1029 IUI procedures performed in 413 couples stimulated by clomiphene citrate, letrozole, or gonadotropins were used to build several models to predict clinical pregnancy. The models included ANN, random forest, PLS, SVM, and linear models using the caret package in R. The models were evaluated using ROC analysis by means of random CV on test data.
Results
Out of the best performing models, the random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.66, a sensitivity of 0.432, and a specificity of 0.756. This performance was followed by the PLS model, which achieved a sensitivity of 0.459 and specificity of 0.734. The other models achieved significantly lower AUCs. When adjusting the predictive cutoff value, confusion matrices show that clinical pregnancy is twice as likely in the case of positive prediction.
Conclusion
Among the compared methods, the random forest and PLS models demonstrated superior performance in predicting the clinical outcome of IUI. With additional research and clinical validation, AI methods may be successfully used in improving patient selection and consequently lead to better clinical results.
Funder
University Medical Centre Maribor
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics(clinical),Developmental Biology,Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Genetics,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem 2018; 62: 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.
2. Datta J, Palmer M, Tanton C, Gibson L, Jones K, Macdowall W, et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Hum Reprod 2016; 31(9): 2108– 2118. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew123.
3. Fauque P, Lehert P, Lamotte M, Bettahar-Lebugle K, Bailly A, Diligent C, et al. Clinical success of intrauterine insemination cycles is affected by the sperm preparation time. Fertil Steril 2014; 101(6): 1618–1623.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.015.
4. Ashrafi M, Rashidi M, Ghasemi A, Arabipoor A, Daghighi S, Pourasghari P, et al. The role of infertility etiology in success rate of intrauterine insemination cycles: an evaluation of predictive factors for pregnancy rate. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;7(2):100–7.
5. Nandi A, Bhide P, Hooper R, Gudi A, Shah A, Khan K, et al. Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2017; 107(6): 1329–1335.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.028.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献