Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information.
Methods
An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The survey covered POC information sources, information delivery preferences, POC and age-related infertility knowledge (study-specific scale), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and time spent considering POC. Target sample size (n=120) was determined using a precision-based method.
Results
Of 332 participants, 249 (75%) had considered POC, whilst 83 (25%) had not. Over half (54%) had searched for POC information. Fertility clinic websites were predominately used (70%). Most (73%) believed women should receive POC information between ages 19-30 years. Preferred information providers were fertility specialists (85%) and primary care physicians (81%). Other methods rated most useful to deliver POC information were online. Mean knowledge score was 8.9/14 (SD:2.3). For participants who had considered POC, mean DCS score was 57.1/100 (SD:27.2) and 78% had high decisional conflict (score >37.5). In regression, lower DCS scores were associated with every 1-point increase in knowledge score (-2.4; 95% CI [-3.9, -0.8]), consulting an IVF specialist (-17.5; [-28.0, -7.1]), and making a POC decision (-18.4; [-27.5, -9.3]). Median time to decision was 24-months (IQR: 12.0-36.0) (n=53).
Conclusion
Women interested in receiving POC information had knowledge gaps, and wanted to be informed about the option by age 30 years from healthcare professionals and online resources. Most women who considered using POC had high decisional conflict indicating a need for decision support.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Developmental Biology,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Genetics,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference69 articles.
1. Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Hipp HS. Frozen eggs: national autologous oocyte thaw outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:1077–84.
2. Johnston M, Richings NM, Leung A, Sakkas D, Catt S. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:624–35.
3. Huttler A, Koelper N, Mainigi M, Gracia C, Senapati S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perception of planned oocyte cryopreservation in the United States. FS Rep. 2022;3:145–52.
4. Raghunandan A, Vyas N, Aluko A, Spandorfer SD, Rosenwaks Z. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social oocyte cryopreservation trends. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:e30.
5. Weidenbaum EM, Cascante SD, DeVore S, Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo JA, Blakemore JK. Lockdown uptick: Did the SARS-COV-2 pandemic generate an increase in planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC)? Fertil Steril. 2021;116:e218–9.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献