Abstract
AbstractCool materials and rooftop vegetation help achieve urban heating mitigation as they can reduce building cooling demands. This study assesses the cooling potential of different mitigation technologies using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)- taking case of a tropical coastal climate in the Kolkata Metropolitan Area. The model was validated using data from six meteorological sites. The cooling potential of eight mitigation scenarios was evaluated for: three cool roofs, four green roofs, and their combination (cool-city). The sensible heat, latent heat, heat storage, 2-m ambient temperature, surface temperature, air temperature, roof temperature, and urban canopy temperature was calculated. The effects on the urban boundary layer were also investigated.The different scenarios reduced the daytime temperature of various urban components, and the effect varied nearly linearly with increasing albedo and green roof fractions. For example, the maximum ambient temperature decreased by 3.6 °C, 0.9 °C, and 1.4 °C for a cool roof with 85% albedo, 100% rooftop vegetation, and their combination.The cost of different mitigation scenarios was assumed to depend on the construction options, location, and market prices. The potential for price per square meter and corresponding temperature decreased was related to one another. Recognizing the complex relationship between scenarios and construction options, the reduction in the maximum and minimum temperature across different cool and green roof cases were used for developing the cost estimates. This estimate thus attempted a summary of the price per degree of cooling for the different potential technologies.Higher green fraction, cool materials, and their combination generally reduced winds and enhanced buoyancy. The surface changes alter the lower atmospheric dynamics such as low-level vertical mixing and a shallower boundary layer and weakened horizontal convective rolls during afternoon hours. Although cool materials offer the highest temperature reductions, the cooling resulting from its combination and a green roof strategy could mitigate or reverse the summertime heat island effect. The results highlight the possibilities for heat mitigation and offer insight into the different strategies and costs for mitigating the urban heating and cooling demands.
Funder
NOAA-NIHHIS-The National Integrated Heat Health Information System
NASA Interdisciplinary Sciences program
National Science Foundation
University of Texas at Austin for William Stamps Farish Chair funds and the Bridging Barriers
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference132 articles.
1. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. (2019). Ahmedabad heat action plan. Guide to extreme heat planning in Ahmedabad, India. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/ahmedabad-heat-action-plan-2018.pdf
2. Akbari, H., & Kolokotsa, D. (2016). Three decades of urban heat islands and mitigation technologies research. Energy and Buildings, 133, 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.067
3. Akbari, H., & Levinson, R. (2008). Evolution of Cool-Roof Standards in the US. Advances in Building Energy Research, 2(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3763/aber.2008.0201
4. Akbari, H., & Matthews, H. D. (2012). Global cooling updates: Reflective roofs and pavements. Energy and Buildings, 55, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02.055
5. Akbari, H., Levinson, R., & Rainer, L. (2005). Monitoring the energy-use effects of cool roofs on California commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 37(10), 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.11.013
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献