A Literature Review on Interactions Between Stakeholders Through Accessibility Indicators Under Mobility as a Service Context-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Literature Review on Interactions Between Stakeholders Through Accessibility Indicators Under Mobility as a Service Context

Published:2021-05-10 Issue:2 Volume:19 Page:468-476
ISSN:1348-8503
Container-title:International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Int. J. ITS Res.

Author:

PHAM Hoang Duy^ORCID,Shimizu Tetsuo^ORCID,NGUYEN Truong Van^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to explore accessibility indicators influencing the interactions between users, transport service providers (TSPs), and a platform operator, generating a conceptual framework for modeling these interactions under Mobility as a Service context. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all studies focusing on indicators and modeling the interactions. There are limitations in integrating psychological indicators and dynamic pricing into the existing models. Moreover, there are gaps in considering monthly service packages, the efficiency of transport systems, and the perspectives of the TSPs for modeling the demand–supply interactions. The study ends with conclusions, discussions, and directions for further studies.

Funder

Tokyo Human Resources Fund for city Diplomacy

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Neuroscience,Computer Science Applications,Software,Automotive Engineering,Applied Mathematics,Control and Systems Engineering,Aerospace Engineering,Information Systems

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13177-021-00257-2.pdf

Reference73 articles.

1. Jittrapirom, P., Narayan, J., Feneri, A.-M., González, M.J.A., Caiati, V., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S.: Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges. Urban Planning 2(2), 13 (2017)

2. Lyons, G., Hammond, P., Mackay, K.: The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 121(January), 22–36 (2019)

3. Utriainen, R., Pöllänen, M.: Review on mobility as a service in scientific publications. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 27(March), 1–9 (2018)

4. Karlsson, M., Sochor, J., Aapaoja, A., Eckhardt, J., König, D.: Impact Assessment - Deliverable Nr 4: MAASiFiE project funded by CEDR. Conference of European Directors of Roads (CEDR) (2017)

5. Karlsson, I.C.M., Sochor, J., Strömberg, H.: Developing the ‘Service’ in Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a Field Trial of an Innovative Travel Brokerage. Transportation Research Procedia 14, 3265–3273 (2016)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service: Insights from empirical studies on influential factors;Communications in Transportation Research;2024-12

2. Socially Sustainable Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A practical MCDM framework to evaluate accessibility and inclusivity with application;Cities;2024-11

3. MaaS modelling: a review of factors, customers’ profiles, choices and business models;European Transport Research Review;2023-10-23

4. Addressing Critical Challenges of Accessibility and Mobility in Peripheral Areas Toward Sustainable Spatial Development and Infrastructure Provision;Analyzing Sustainability in Peripheral, Ultra-Peripheral, and Low-Density Regions;2022-06-24