Abstract
AbstractA popular stance amongst philosophers is one according to which, in Lewis’ words, “identity is utterly simple and unproblematic”. Building from Lewis’ famous passage on the matter, we reconstruct, and then criticize, an argument to the conclusion that identities cannot be grounded. With the help of relatively uncontroversial assumption concerning identity facts, we show that not all identities are equi-fundamental, and, on the contrary, some appear to be provided potential grounding bases using two-level identity criteria. Further potential grounding bases for identities are presented. Identity might be utterly simple and unproblematic, but this is not sufficient to conclude that identities are ungrounded, or fundamental.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Azzano, L. & Carrara, M. (2020) (MS). Explaining identities: Towards a non-causal contrastive explanation of identities. Theozia. A Swedish Journal of philosophy, online first (18/11/20).
2. Bennett, K. (2011). By our bootstraps. Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1), 27–41.
3. Bliss, R. & Trogdon, K. (2014). Metaphysical grounding. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
4. Block, N., & Stalnaker, R. (1999). Conceptual analysis, dualism, and the explanatory gap. Philosophical Review, 108(1), 1–46.
5. Burgess, A. (2012). A puzzle about identity. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1(2), 90–99.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献