Abstract
AbstractDion is a human person, Lefty is his left foot, and Theon is Lefty-Complement, a proper part of Dion. Lefty is annihilated and Dion survives left-footless. After Lefty’s annihilation Theon, if he survives, occupies the same region as Dion. I suggest that this scenario be understood as a fusion case in which Dion and Theon, initially overlapping but distinct, are identical after Lefty’s annihilation and propose an account of proper names that allows us to say that Dion and Theon have ‘become identical’ without commitment to occasional identity or other controversial metaphysical doctrines. The proposed solution employs the semantics developed by Wolfgang Schwarz to address the ‘paradox of occasional identity’, posed by puzzle cases of fission, to deal with the problem of Dion and Theon, a body-minus puzzle.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference8 articles.
1. Burke, M. (1994). “Dion and Theon: An essentialist solution to an ancient puzzle.” Journal of Philosophym, 91(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.687.
2. Carmichael, C. (2020). How to solve the puzzle of Dion and Theon without losing your head. Mind, 129, 205–224.
3. Gallois, A. (1998). Occasions of identity: A study in the metaphysics of persistence, change, and sameness. Oxford University Press.
4. Moran, A. (2018). The Paradox of decrease and dependent parts. Ratio, 31, 273–284.
5. Olson, E. T. (2006). The paradox of increase. The Monist, 89, 390–417.