Abstract
AbstractThis paper will show that if we take conventional ethics seriously, then there is no moral justification for business profits. To show this, we explore three conventional ethical theories, namely Christian ethics, Kantian ethics and Utilitarian ethics. Since they essentially reject self-interest, they also reject the essence of business: the profit motive. To illustrate the relationship, we will concretize how the anti-egoist perspective expresses itself in business and business ethics. In business, we look at what many businesses regard as proof of their virtue. In business ethics, we look at what many business ethicists say about the relationship between morality and self-interest and, thus, the profit motive. Ultimately, we will argue that conventional ethics can, at most, only justify the means of business (i.e., aspects of running a business), but not the end of business (i.e., profits).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference130 articles.
1. Altruists International. (2019). What Is Altruism? http://www.altruists.org/about/altruism/. Accessed 1 Aug 2019.
2. Andre, C., & Velasquez, M. (1989). Unmasking the motives of the good Samaritan. Issues in Ethics, 2(1).
3. Annas, J. (1992). Ancient ethics and modern morality. Philosophical Perspectives, 6, 119–136.
4. Annas, J. (1995). The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Aristotle. (1908). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Ross, W.D. (Original work published 350 B.C.E.) http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.9.ix.html. Accessed 10 June 2020.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献