Abstract
AbstractIn this contribution, I defend the standard list of jus ad bellum principles. In The Ethics of War and the Force of Law: A Modern Just War Theory, Uwe Steinhoff endorses only three principles of jus ad bellum (right intention, just cause, and proportionality) and claims that the others are redundant. I argue that, although fundamentally all jus ad bellum principles can be reduced to proportionality, in practice it is vital to retain the main jus ad bellum criteria as separate principles.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Aloyo, E. (2015). Just war theory and the last of last resort. Ethics & International Affairs, 29/2, 187–201.
2. Avant, D. (2005). The market for force: Consequences of privatizing security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Avant, D. (2006). The implications of marketized security for IR theory: The democratic peace, late state building, and the nature and frequency of conflict. Perspectives on Politics, 4/3, 507–528.
4. Buchanan, A. (2018). A richer Jus ad Bellum. In S. Lazar, & H. Frowe (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethics and war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Cohen, G. A. (2003). Facts and principles. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31/3, 211–245.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Reply to Critics;Philosophia;2023-08-02