Abstract
Abstracti) Íngrid Vendrell Ferran’s defence of the ‘experiential view’ and her related conception of ‘radical neo-cogntivism’, ii) Robert Piercey’s view of the epistemic value of plots and emplotment, iii) Marya Schechtman’s revisionist ideas of self-narration, and, finally, iv) David Collins’s suggestion of the value of an imaginative engagement with the author of an artwork.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Collins, D. (2023). Imagining the author: Historical understanding and the cognitive value of art. Philosophia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-023-00698-x
2. Davis, C. (2013). Ethics, stories and reading. SubStance, 42, 128–140.
3. Elgin, C. Z. (2002). Art in the advancement of understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 1–12.
4. Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. Routledge.
5. Harold, J. (2016). Literary cognitivism. In N. Carroll & J. Gibson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of literature (pp. 382–393). Routledge.