Abstract
AbstractIn the paper, I aim to reconstruct a charitable interpretation of Durkheimian utilitarianism, a normative theory of public morality proposed by well-recognised American moral psychologist – Jonathan Haidt, which might provide reasons to justify particular legal regulations and public policies. The reconstruction contains a coherent theory that includes elements of rule-utilitarianism, value pluralism, objective list theory and perfectionism, as well as references to Emile’s Durkheim views on human nature. I also compare Durkheimian utilitarianism with two similar theories – Brad Hooker’s rule consequentialism and Krzysztof Saja’s institutional function consequentialism.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Björklund, F., Haidt, J., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. http://theskepticalzone.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/haidt.bjorklund.working-paper.when-intuition-finds-no-reason.pub603.pdf
2. Chang, R. (2013). Incommensurability (and Incomparability). In: International Encyclopedia of Ethics https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee030
3. Crisp, R. (2006). Reasons and the Good. Clarendon Press
4. Fletcher, G. (2013). A Fresh Start for an Objective List Theory of Well-Being. Utilitas, 25(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820812000453
5. Gibbs, J. C. (2019). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献