Abstract
AbstractInvestigation into the reality of time can be pursued within the ontological domain or it can also span human thought and natural language. I propose to approach time by correlating three domains of inquiry: metaphysical time (M), the human concept of time (E), and temporal reference in natural language (L), entertaining the possibility of what I call a ‘horizontal reduction’ (L > E > M) and ‘vertical reduction’. I present a view of temporalityL/E as epistemic modality, drawing on evidence from the L domain and its correlates in the E and M domains. On this view, the human concept of time is a complex, ‘molecular’ concept and can be broken down into primitive concepts that are modal in nature, featuring as degrees of epistemic commitment to representations of states of affairs. I present evidence from tensed and tenseless languages (endorsing the L > E path) and point out its compatibility with the view of real time as metaphysical modality (endorsing the E > M path).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Abusch, D. (1988). Sequence of tense, intensionality and scope. In H. Borer (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 1–14). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
2. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (Ed.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献