Abstract
AbstractAmbitious goals to combat pollution should be supported in policies that discourage the use of private cars, notably old and more polluting vehicles. Price signals, such as a congestion tax, and traffic restrictions, such as low-emission zones (LEZ), are widely used tools among European cities to limit car use. In this paper, we look at the dissuasive effect of the implementation of the Madrid Central LEZ and analyze how traffic intensity has been affected in both the restricted area and in other zones of the city. Although the ultimate policy goal of LEZ is to reduce pollution, the instrument considered is traffic limitations, so it is important to know whether or not traffic intensity has been affected by traffic restrictions. Despite its limited extension and the adoption of long transitional periods, the LEZ of Madrid has been seriously questioned from its inception. The results show that traffic intensity has been reduced in the Madrid Central zone but has unfortunately increased in bordering areas. Previous studies on the effects of Madrid Central have not taken into account this potential substitution effect. The future design of a mobility policy in the metropolitan area of Madrid should address this undesirable outcome.
Funder
Comunidad de Madrid
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Transportation,Development,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference16 articles.
1. Acción, Ecologistas en. “Balance del efecto de Madrid Central sobre la calidad del aire de Madrid en 2019.” 2020, 17.
2. Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., Hugosson, M.B., Brundell-Freij, K.: The Stockholm congestion charges—5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt. Transp. Policy 20, 1–12 (2012)
3. Burgalassi, David, Luzzati, Tommaso: Urban spatial structure and environmental emissions: A survey of the literature and some empirical evidence for Italian NUTS 3 regions. Cities 49, 134–148 (2015)
4. Carslaw, David C., Beevers, Sean D.: The efficacy of low emission zones in central London as a means of reducing nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Trans. Res. Part D: Trans. Environ. 7(1), 49–64 (2002)
5. Deloitte-Ipd. Encuesta de Movilidad de la Comunidad de Madrid 2018. Consorcio Regional de Transportes de Madrid, (2018)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献