Abstract
Abstract
With recent policies such as the Clean Miles Standard in California and Lyft’s announcement to reach 100% electric vehicles (EVs) by 2030, the electrification of vehicles on ride-hailing platforms is inevitable. The impacts of this transition are not well-studied. This work attempts to examine the infrastructure deployment necessary to meet demand from electric vehicles being driven on Uber and Lyft platforms using empirical trip data from the two services. We develop the Widespread Infrastructure for Ride-hail EV Deployment model to examine a set of case studies for charger installation in San Diego, Los Angeles, and the San Francisco Bay Area. We also conduct a set of sensitivity scenarios to measure the tradeoff between explicit costs of infrastructure versus weighting factors for valuing the time for drivers to travel to a charger (from where they are providing rides) and valuing the rate of charging (to minimize the amount of time that drivers have to wait to charge their vehicle). There are several notable findings from our study: (1) DC fast charging infrastructure is the dominant charger type necessary to meet ride-hailing demand, (2) shifting to overnight charging behavior that places less emphasis on daytime public charging can significantly reduce costs, and (3) the necessary ratio of chargers is approximately 10 times higher for EVs in Uber and Lyft compared to chargers for the general EV owning public.
Funder
Pacific Southwest Region of the National Center for Sustainable Transportation
3 Revolutions Research Center
California Energy Commission
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Transportation,Development,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference25 articles.
1. Alexander M, Noel C, Wendell K, Jeffrey L, Raja R (2021) Assembly bill 2127 electric vehicle charging infrastructure assessment: analyzing charging needs to support zero-emission vehicles in 2030. Calif Energy Comm
2. Anderson, J.E., Lehne, M., Hardinghaus, M.: What Electric vehicle users want: real-world preferences for public charging infrastructure. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12(5), 341–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1372538
3. Bauer, G.S., Phadke, A., Greenblatt, J.B., Rajagopal, D.: Electrifying urban ridesourcing fleets at no added cost through efficient use of charging infrastructure. Trans. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 105(August), 385–404 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.041
4. Brown, A., LaValle, W.: Hailing a change: comparing taxi and Ridehail service quality in Los Angeles. Transportation 48(2), 1007–1031 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10086-z
5. Brown, A., Klein, N.J., Smart, M.J., Howell, A.: Buying access one trip at a time: lower-income households and ride-hail. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 88(4), 495–507 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2027262
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献