Abstract
AbstractThis paper studies the relationship between trip chain complexity and daily travel behaviour of travellers. While trip chain complexity is conventionally investigated between travel modes, our scope is the more aggregated level of a person’s activity-travel pattern. Using data from the Netherlands Mobility Panel, a latent class cluster analysis was performed to group people with similar mode choice behaviour in distinct mobility pattern classes. All trip chains were assigned to both a travel mode and the mobility pattern class of the traveller. Subsequently, differences in trip chain complexity distributions were analysed between travel modes and between mobility pattern classes. Results indicate considerable differences between travel modes, particularly between multimodal and unimodal trip chains, but also between the unimodal travel modes car, bicycle, walking and public transport trip chains. No substantial differences in trip chain complexity were found between mobility pattern classes. Independently of the included travel modes, the distributions of trip chain complexity degrees were similar across mobility pattern classes. This means that personal circumstances such as the number of working hours or household members are not systematically translated into specific mobility patterns.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Transportation,Development,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference23 articles.
1. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. https://www.cbs.nl/ (2016). Retrieved 7 Nov 2018
2. Chen, Y.-J., Akar, G.: Using trip chaining and joint travel as mediating variables to explore the relationships among travel behavior, socio-demographics, and urban form. J. Transp. Land Use (2017). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.882
3. Currie, G., Delbosc, A.: Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne. Transp. Policy (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.003
4. de Haas, M.C., Scheepers, C.E., Harms, L.W.J., Kroesen, M.: Travel pattern transitions: applying latent transition analysis within the mobility biographies framework. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 107(March 2017), 140–151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.007
5. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (and Sex and Drugs and Rock “n” Roll), 3rd edn. Sage, Los Angeles (2009)
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献