Author:
Llop-Harillo Immaculada,Pérez-González Antonio,Andrés-Esperanza Javier
Abstract
AbstractAnthropomorphic hands have received increasing research interest in the fields of robotics and prosthetics. But it is not yet clear how to evaluate their anthropomorphism. Similarity in the kinematic chain is essential to achieve both functionality and cosmesis. A few previous works have addressed the definition of anthropomorphism indexes, although they have some limitations in its definition. In this study, three different anthropomorphism indexes have been defined to compare the kinematic chain of artificial hands with that of the human hand. These indexes are based on the comparison of: (1) the parameters of the kinematic chain (dimensions, type of joints, orientations and ranges of motion), (2) the reachable workspace, and (3) common grasping postures. Five artificial hands with different degrees of anthropomorphism have been compared using the three Anthropomorphism Indexes of the Kinematic Chain (AIKC). The results show a high correlation between the first and third AIKC for the hands compared. The second AIKC presents much lower values than the other two, although they are higher for hands that combine abduction/adduction and flexion/extension movements in the kinematic chain of each finger. These indexes can be useful during the initial stage of designing artificial hands or evaluating their anthropomorphism.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Bioengineering,Biophysics,Biotechnology
Reference38 articles.
1. Parada Puig J E, Rodriguez N E N, Ceccarelli M. A methodology for the design of robotic hands with multiple fingers. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2008, 5, 177–184.
2. Kemp C, Edsinger A, Torres-Jara E. Challenges for robot manipulation in human environments [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2007, 14, 20–29.
3. Liarokapis M V, Artemiadis P K, Kyriakopoulos K J. Functional Anthropomorphism for human to robot motion mapping. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Paris, France, 2012, 31–36.
4. Belter J T, Segil J L, Dollar A M, Weir R F. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A review. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2013, 50, 599–618.
5. ten Kate J, Smit G, Breedveld P. 3D-printed upper limb prostheses: A review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2017, 12, 300–314.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献