Copy number signatures and CCNE1 amplification reveal the involvement of replication stress in high-grade endometrial tumors oncogenesis
-
Published:2024-04-02
Issue:4
Volume:47
Page:1441-1457
-
ISSN:2211-3428
-
Container-title:Cellular Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cell Oncol.
Author:
Marlin Regine,Loger Jean-Samuel,Joachim Clarisse,Ebring Coralie,Robert-Siegwald Guillaume,Pennont Sabrina,Rose Mickaelle,Raguette Kevin,Suez-Panama Valerie,Ulric-Gervaise Sylviane,Lusbec Sylvie,Bera Odile,Vallard Alexis,Aline-Fardin Aude,Colomba Emeline,Jean-Laurent Mehdi
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Managing high-grade endometrial cancer in Martinique poses significant challenges. The diversity of copy number alterations in high-grade endometrial tumors, often associated with a TP53 mutation, is a key factor complicating treatment. Due to the high incidence of high-grade tumors with poor prognosis, our study aimed to characterize the molecular signature of these tumors within a cohort of 25 high-grade endometrial cases.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive pangenomic analysis to categorize the copy number alterations involved in these tumors. Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) and Homologous Recombination (HR) analysis were performed. The alterations obtained from the WES were classified into various signatures using the Copy Number Signatures tool available in COSMIC.
Results
We identified several signatures that correlated with tumor stage and disctinct prognoses. These signatures all seem to be linked to replication stress, with CCNE1 amplification identified as the primary driver of oncogenesis in over 70% of tumors analyzed.
Conclusion
The identification of CCNE1 amplification, which is currently being explored as a therapeutic target in clinical trials, suggests new treatment strategies for high-grade endometrial cancer. This finding holds particular significance for Martinique, where access to care is challenging.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference80 articles.
1. C. Ebring, R. Marlin, J. Macni, A. Vallard, S. Bergerac, M. Beaubrun-Renard, C. Joachim, and M. Jean-Laurent, PLoS One 18, e0278757 (2023) 2. N. Concin, X. Matias-Guiu, I. Vergote, D. Cibula, M.R. Mirza, S. Marnitz, J. Ledermann, T. Bosse, C. Chargari, A. Fagotti, C. Fotopoulou, A. Gonzalez Martin, S. Lax, D. Lorusso, C. Marth, P. Morice, R.A. Nout, D. O’Donnell, D. Querleu, M.R. Raspollini, J. Sehouli, A. Sturdza, A. Taylor, A. Westermann, P. Wimberger, N. Colombo, F. Planchamp, C.L. Creutzberg, Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 31, 12 (2021) 3. N.R. Abu-Rustum, C.M. Yashar, K. Bradley, S.M. Campos, J. Chino, H.S. Chon, C. Chu, D. Cohn, M.A. Crispens, S. Damast, E. Diver, C.M. Fisher, P. Frederick, D.K. Gaffney, S. George, R. Giuntoli, E. Han, B. Howitt, W.K. Huh, J. Lea, A. Mariani, D. Mutch, L. Nekhlyudov, M. Podoll, S.W. Remmenga, R.K. Reynolds, R. Salani, R. Sisodia, P. Soliman, E. Tanner, S. Ueda, R. Urban, S.L. Wethington, E. Wyse, K. Zanotti, N.R. McMillian, and A. D. Motter, J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19, 888 (2021) 4. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, C. Kandoth, N. Schultz, A.D. Cherniack, R. Akbani, Y. Liu, H. Shen, A.G. Robertson, I. Pashtan, R. Shen, C.C. Benz, C. Yau, P.W. Laird, L. Ding, W. Zhang, G.B. Mills, R. Kucherlapati, E.R. Mardis, D.A. Levine, Nature. 497, 67 (2013) 5. M. Le Gallo, A.J. O’Hara, M.L. Rudd, M.E. Urick, N.F. Hansen, N.J. O’Neil, J.C. Price, S. Zhang, B.M. England, A.K. Godwin, D.C. Sgroi, P. Hieter, J.C. Mullikin, M.J. Merino, D.W. Bell, Nat. Genet. 44, 1310 (2012)
|
|