Abstract
AbstractThe field of computational law has increasingly moved into the focus of the scientific community, with recent research analysing its issues and risks. In this article, we seek to draw a structured and comprehensive list of societal issues that the deployment of automatically processable regulation could entail. We do this by systematically exploring attributes of the law that are being challenged through its encoding and by taking stock of what issues current projects in this field raise. This article adds to the current literature not only by providing a needed framework to structure arising issues of computational law but also by bridging the gap between theoretical literature and practical implementation. Key findings of this article are: (1) The primary benefit (efficiency vs. accessibility) sought after when encoding law matters with respect to the issues such an endeavor triggers; (2) Specific characteristics of a project—project type, degree of mediation by computers, and potential for divergence of interests—each impact the overall number of societal issues arising from the implementation of automatically processable regulation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Artificial Intelligence
Reference82 articles.
1. Aidinlis S, Smith H, Armour J, Adams-Prassl J (Forthcoming) Lawful grounds to share justice data for Legal/Tech Innovation in the UK
2. Alauzen M (2021) Splendeurs et misères d’une start-up d’Etat: Dispute dans la lutte contre le non-recours aux droits sociaux en France (2013–2020). Réseaux 225:121–150
3. Bandes SA (2000) When victims seek closure: forgiveness, vengeance and the role of government. Fordham Urban Law J 27(5):1599–1606
4. Bandes SA (2009) Victims, closure, and the sociology of emotion. Law Contemp Probl 72(2):1–26
5. Besley T, Persson T (2011) The logic of political violence. Q J Econ 126(3):1411–1445
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献