Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals

Published:2009-11-06 Issue:4 Volume:17 Page:321-370
ISSN:0924-8463
Container-title:Artificial Intelligence and Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Artif Intell Law

Author:

Ashley Kevin D.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Artificial Intelligence

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10506-009-9083-y.pdf

Reference54 articles.

1. Aleven V (2003) Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artif Intell 150:183–238

2. Ashley K (1988) Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. COINS Tech Rept 88-01

3. Ashley K (1990) Modeling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. The MIT Press, Cambridge

4. Ashley K (2000) Designing electronic casebooks that talk back: the CATO program. Jurimetrics 40:275–319

5. Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2007) Argumentation and standards of proof. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM Press, 107–116

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19

2. Legal document assembly system for introducing law students with legal drafting;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2022-11-16

3. Path and future of artificial intelligence in the field of justice: a systematic literature review and a research agenda;SN Social Sciences;2022-08-27

4. Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: overviews;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2022-08-06

5. Precedent and Legal Analogy;Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation;2018