Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Artificial Intelligence
Reference54 articles.
1. Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Lampos V (2016) Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput Sci 2:e93
2. Ashley KD, Brüninghaus S (2009) Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. Artif Intell Law 17(2):125–165
3. Bertalan VGF, Ruiz EES (2020) Predicting judicial outcomes in the Brazilian legal system using textual features. In: DHandNLP@ PROPOR, pp 22–32
4. Bex F, Prakken H (2021) On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2021). ACM Press
5. Bhilare P, Parab N, Soni N, Thakur B (2019) Predicting outcome of judicial cases and analysis using machine learning. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 6:326–330
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献