The prevalence and anatomy of accessory navicular bone: a meta-analysis

Author:

Stolarz KacperORCID,Osiowski AleksanderORCID,Preinl MaciejORCID,Osiowski MaksymilianORCID,Jasiewicz BarbaraORCID,Taterra DominikORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose There have been over 40 descriptions of the common developmental variants of the accessory ossicles of the feet. Although predominantly asymptomatic, they sometimes may be linked to painful conditions. One of the most common accessory ossicles in the foot is the accessory navicular bone (AN), located on the medial side of the foot. Our research provides a first meta-analysis on this topic that establishes its frequency by contrasting 39 studies from across the globe. Methods Up to February 2024, PubMed and Embase databases were thoroughly searched for research on the AN. Eligible data regarding AN prevalence was extracted. This study strictly adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results A total of 39 studies, 11,015 patients, and 36,837 feet were analyzed in our study. The pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of AN was found to be 17.5% (95%CI: 11.5–25.7) and 12.6% (95%CI: 10.1–15.5) in patients and feet analyses, respectively. Accessory navicular occurred bilaterally in 50.0% of patients, with similar distribution in gender-based groups (21.1% of males and 22.0% of females were confirmed with AN). Accessory navicular was most prevalent in the East Asian population (38.4%) and least prevalent in North Americans (8.0%). No significant differences in AN prevalence were found when comparing different imaging modalities (X-ray and cadaver dissection). Conclusion Accessory navicular is a common finding in imaging studies. Its prevalence depends on the population covered by the study but is not affected by the patient’s gender or the imaging modality utilized for AN assessment.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference70 articles.

1. Alsager GA, Alzahrani K, Alshayhan F, Alotaibi RA, Murrad K, Arafah O (2022) Prevalence and classification of accessory navicular bone: a medical record review. Ann Saudi Med 42:327–333. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.327

2. Bagley C, McIlhone S, Singla N, Berkeley R, O’donnell P, Tennant S, Saifuddin A (2022) MRI for paediatric flatfoot: is it necessary? Br J Radiol 95. https://doi.org/10.1259/BJR.20210784

3. Bayramoğlu A, Demiryürek D, Fırat A, Öznur A, Özsoy MH (2009) Differential diagnosis in an professional basketball player with foot pain: is it an avulsion fracture or an os supranaviculare? Jt Dis Relat Surg 20:059–061

4. Bizarro AH, London FRCS (1921) On sesamoid and Supernumerary bones of the limbs. J Anat 55:256

5. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2022) Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3