Neural networks and arbitrage in the VIX

Author:

Osterrieder JoergORCID,Kucharczyk Daniel,Rudolf Silas,Wittwer Daniel

Abstract

AbstractThe Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) is considered by many market participants as a common measure of market risk and investors’ sentiment, representing the market’s expectation of the 30-day-ahead looking implied volatility obtained from real-time prices of options on the S&P 500 index. While smaller deviations between implied and realized volatility are a well-known stylized fact of financial markets, large, time-varying differences are also frequently observed throughout the day. Furthermore, substantial deviations between the VIX and its futures might lead to arbitrage opportunities on the VIX market. Arbitrage is hard to exploit as the potential strategy to exploit it requires buying several hundred, mostly illiquid, out-of-the-money (put and call) options on the S&P 500 index. This paper discusses a novel approach to predicting the VIX on an intraday scale by using just a subset of the most liquid options. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this the first paper, that describes a new methodology on how to predict the VIX (to potentially exploit arbitrage opportunities using VIX futures) using most recently developed machine learning models to intraday data of S&P 500 options and the VIX. The presented results are supposed to shed more light on the underlying dynamics in the options markets, help other investors to better understand the market and support regulators to investigate market inefficiencies.

Funder

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering

Reference25 articles.

1. Andersen, T. G., Bondarenko, O., & Gonzalez-Perez, M. T. (2015). Exploring return dynamics via corridor implied volatility. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(10), 2902.

2. Bao, W., Yue, J., & Rao, Y. (2017). PloS One, 12(7), e0180944.

3. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 1.

4. Brenner, M., & Galai, D. (1989). New financial instruments for hedge changes in volatility. Financial Analysts Journal, 45(4), 61.

5. Demeterfi, K., Derman, E., Kamal, M., & Zou, J. (1999). More than you ever wanted to know about volatility swaps. Quantitative strategies research notes, Goldman Sachs.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3