Abstract
AbstractSeveral cryptocurrency (CC) indices track the dynamics of the rising CC sector, and soon ETFs will be issued on them. We conduct a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the currently existing CC indices. As the CC sector is not yet consolidated, index issuers face the challenge of tracking the dynamics of a fast-growing sector that is under continuous transformation. We propose several criteria and various measures to compare the indices under review. Major differences between the indices lie in their weighting schemes, their coverage of CCs and the number of constituents, the level of transparency, and thus, their accuracy in mapping the dynamics of the CC sector. Our analysis reveals that simple market cap-weighted indices outperform their competitors. Interestingly, increasing the number of constituents does not automatically lead to a better fit of the CC sector. All codes are available on "Image missing".
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
European Union Horizon 2020
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Ankenbrand, T., & Bieri, D. (2018). Assessment of cryptocurrencies as an asset class by their characteristics. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(3), 169–181.
2. Bailey, D. H., & Lopez de Prado, M. (2012). The Sharpe ratio efficient frontier. Journal of Risk, 15(2), 13.
3. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
4. Elendner, H. (2018). F5: optimised crypto-currency investment strategies. White paper. Available at https://f5crypto.com
5. Elendner, H., Trimborn, S., Ong, B., & Lee, T. M. (2018). The cross-section of crypto-currencies as financial assets: Investing in crypto-currencies beyond bitcoin. Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion (Vol. 1, pp. 145–173). Elsevier.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献