Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates stock recommendations from the three largest finance subreddits on Reddit: wallstreetbets, investing and stocks. A simple strategy that buys recommended stocks weighted by the number of posts per day yields a portfolio with higher average returns at the expense of higher risks than the market for all holding periods, i.e., unfavorable Sharpe ratios. Furthermore, the strategy leads to positive (insignificant) short-term and negative (significant) long-term alphas when considering common risk factors. This is consistent with the idea of “meme stocks”, meaning that the recommended stocks are artificially inflated in the short term when they are recommended, and that the posts contain no information about long-term success. However, it is likely that Reddit users, especially on the subreddit wallstreetbets, have preferences for bets which are not captured by the mean–variance framework. Therefore, we draw on cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We find that the CPT-valuations of the Reddit portfolio exceed those of the market, which may explain the persistent attractiveness for investors to follow social media stock recommendations despite the unfavorable risk-return ratio.
Funder
Technische Universität Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Agrawal, P., Buz, T, & de Melo, G. (2022). WallStreetBets beyond GameStop, YOLOs, and the moon: the unique traits of reddit’s finance communities. twenty-eighth Americas conference on information systems. http://gerard.demelo.org/papers/wallstreetbets-social.pdf.
2. Amaya, D., Christoffersen, P., Jacobs, K., & Vasquez, A. (2015). Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of equity returns? Journal of Financial Economics, 118(1), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.009.
3. An, L., Wang, H., Wang, J., & Jianfeng, Y. (2020). Lottery-related anomalies: the role of reference-dependent preferences. Management Science, 66(1), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3205.
4. Antweiler, W., & Frank, M. Z. (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1259–1294.
5. Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.014.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献