Uncertainties in Spatial Orientation: Critical Limits for Landmark Inaccuracies in Maps in the Context of Map Matching

Author:

Keil JulianORCID,Edler DennisORCID,Dickmann FrankORCID,Kuchinke Lars

Abstract

AbstractMap information, especially volunteered geographic information (VGI) is prone to spatial inaccuracies. Due to their use as spatial reference points, spatially inaccurate landmark representations in maps might affect the ability to match maps to the represented 3D space and might compromise self-localization and orientation. Based on a map matching task in a virtual 3D environment and various degrees of spatial landmark inaccuracies in a simultaneously presented 2D map, we aimed to identify acceptable and critical values of spatial inaccuracies. Furthermore, potential effects of inaccurate semantic spatial categories were evaluated. The findings demonstrate how metric and semantic spatial inaccuracies of landmark representations affect matching of maps to the represented 3D space. Map inaccuracies corresponding to more than 10 m within 3D space and swapped landmark pictograms in a map were associated with the perception of a mismatch between maps and 3D spaces. Furthermore, the distance of landmarks to the perceiver was found to affect map matching. Spatial inaccuracies of landmark pictograms were less likely to be associated with a perceived mismatch between maps and 3D spaces when the landmarks were further away, presumably because small or moderate inaccuracies were more difficult to perceive. To reduce the identified effects of landmark inaccuracies in maps on map-matching performance, we propose to identify means to quantify the uncertainty concerning spatial landmark inaccuracies and to visually communicate this uncertainty to map users.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Earth-Surface Processes

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3