Understanding the Haemodynamics of Hypertension

Author:

Smith B. E.,Madigan V. M.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Internal Medicine

Reference72 articles.

1. •• Phillips RA, Smith BE, Madigan VM. Stroke volume monitoring: novel continuous wave doppler parameters, algorithms and advanced noninvasive haemodynamic concepts. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017;7(4):387–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-017-0235-4 . This review summarises the methods available to the clinician to evaluate haemodynamics using non- and minimally-invasive methods. It includes the basic science of Doppler methods and echocardiography, along with the strengths and limitations of each method.

2. Lin ACW, Lowe A, Sidhu K, Harrison W, Ruygrok P, Stewart R. Evaluation of a novel sphygmomanometer, which estimates central aortic blood pressure from analysis of brachial artery suprasystolic pressure waves. J Hypertens. 2012;30(9):1743–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283567b94 .

3. Robin ED. The cult of the Swan-Ganz catheter: overuse and abuse of pulmonary flow catheters. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(3):445–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-103-3-445 .

4. •• Hall JB. Searching for evidence to support pulmonary artery catheter use in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2005;294(13):1693–4. Although a little dated, this editorial from 2005, some 35 years after the introduction of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), discusses the evidence in terms of patient outcomes and the impact, or more accurately, lack of impact, of the PAC. Although often considered or referred to as the “gold standard” of haemodynamic monitoring and cardiac output measurement, in fact there is little evidence to support this view. The ESCAPE trial which was terminated early due to excessive adverse effects in the PAC group is also discussed, as is the case for using non-PAC methods of evaluating haemodynamics.

5. Marik P. Obituary: pulmonary artery catheter 1970 to 2013. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-38 .

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3