Abstract
AbstractThis study presents an application of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting the presence of stenoses and aneurysms in the human arterial system. Four major forms of arterial disease—carotid artery stenosis (CAS), subclavian artery stenosis (SAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA)—are considered. The ML methods are trained and tested on a physiologically realistic virtual patient database (VPD) containing 28,868 healthy subjects, adapted from the authors previous work and augmented to include disease. It is found that the tree-based methods of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting outperform other approaches. The performance of ML methods is quantified through the $$F_1$$
F
1
score and computation of sensitivities and specificities. When using six haemodynamic measurements (pressure in the common carotid, brachial, and radial arteries; and flow-rate in the common carotid, brachial, and femoral arteries), it is found that maximum $$F_1$$
F
1
scores larger than 0.9 are achieved for CAS and PAD, larger than 0.85 for SAS, and larger than 0.98 for both low- and high-severity AAAs. Corresponding sensitivities and specificities are larger than 90% for CAS and PAD, larger than 85% for SAS, and larger than 98% for both low- and high-severity AAAs. When reducing the number of measurements, performance is degraded by less than 5% when three measurements are used, and less than 10% when only two measurements are used for classification. For AAA, it is shown that $$F_1$$
F
1
scores larger than 0.85 and corresponding sensitivities and specificities larger than 85% are achievable when using only a single measurement. The results are encouraging to pursue AAA monitoring and screening through wearable devices which can reliably measure pressure or flow-rates.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Modelling and Simulation,Biotechnology
Reference62 articles.
1. Aboyans V, Desormais I, Lacroix P, Salazar J, Criqui MH, Laskar M (2010) The general prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease differs according to the disease localization. J Am College Cardiol 55(9):898–903
2. Adji A, Hirata K, O’rourke MF (2006) Clinical use of indices determined non-invasively from the radial and carotid pressure waveforms. Blood Pressure Monitor 11(4):215–221
3. Alastruey J, Parker KH, Sherwin SJ et al (2012) Arterial pulse wave haemodynamics. In: 11th International Conference on Pressure Surges. Virtual PiE Led t/a BHR Group, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 401–442
4. Boileau E, Nithiarasu P, Blanco PJ, Müller LO, Fossan FE, Hellevik LR, Donders WP, Huberts W, Willemet M, Alastruey J (2015) “A benchmark study of numerical schemes for one-dimensional arterial blood flow modelling”. In: International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering 31.10
5. Boileau E, Pant S, Roobottom C, Sazonov I, Deng J, Xie X, Nithiarasu P (2018) Estimating the accuracy of a reduced-order model for the calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR). Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 34(1):e2908
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献