The return of non-probability sample: the electoral polls at the time of internet and social media

Author:

Di Franco GiovanniORCID

Abstract

AbstractFor the past 80 years survey researchers have used a probability sampling framework. Probability samples have a well-defined set of quality criteria that have been organized around the concept of Total Survey Error (TSE). Non-probability samples do not fit within this framework very well and some possible alternatives to TSE are explored. In recent years, electoral polls have undergone changes as a result of the dispersion of public opinion due mostly, but not only, to the development of the web and social media. From a methodological point of view, the main changes concerned sampling and data collection techniques. The aim of the article is to provide a critical contribution to the methodological debate on electoral polls with particular attention to the samples used which appear to be more similar to non-probability samples than to the traditional probability samples used for many decades in electoral polls. We will explore several new approaches that attempt to make inference possible even when a survey sample does not match the classic probability sample. We will also discuss a set of post hoc adjustments that have been suggested as ways to reduce the bias in estimates from non-probability samples; these adjustments use auxiliary data in an effort to deal with selection and other biases. Propensity score adjustment is the most well know of these techniques. The empirical section of the article analyzes a database of 1793 electoral polls conducted in Italy from January 2017 to July 2023.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference75 articles.

1. AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research): Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling. June (2013)

2. AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research): Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th edition (2011)

3. Alvarez, R., VanBeselaere, M., VanBeselaere, C.: Web-Based Surveys. The Encyclopedia of Measurement. California Institute of Technology (2005)

4. Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: Predicting the Future with Social Media. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.5699v1 (2010)

5. Atkeson, L., Adams, A., Alvarez, R.: Nonresponse and mode effects in self- and interviewer-administered survey. Political Anal. 22(3), 304–320 (2014)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3