Abstract
AbstractSpatial ability contributes to performance in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Spatial skills and creativity are required for engineering studies. Low spatial abilities can lead to the dropout of students’ university studies. In this study the Spatial Ability Extra Tasks (SAET) was developed to evaluate engineering students’ complex spatial abilities. A total of 93 first-year engineering students from University of Debrecen Faculty of Engineering and Sharif University of Technology in Tehran participated, with regard to final mathematical exam and their gender, participated in the study. SAET measures parts of spatial abilities: mental cutting and mental rotation and creativity. Analysis of the findings suggested that SAET is valid and reliable. The separate tests results have been statistically evaluated and conclusions were formulated. We used Structural Equation Modeling analysis. We separate two types of tasks by SAET which are Polyhedron part and Curved Surface part. According to obtained data, accomplished the results: students of University of Debrecen are more successful at Curved Surfaces. In addition students of Sharif University are more successful at Polyhedrons. The square cross section was found by most student in both countries in Polyhedrons. It is remarkable that first-year engineering students of Tehran are more successful at Polyhedrons by pentagon, hexagon and parallelogram solution; and students of Debrecen are more successful by square and rectangle solution. Students of Debrecen are more successful at Curved Surfaces to find circle solution of cylinder, cone and sphere; students of Tehran are more successful by finding parabola solution of cone.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Statistics and Probability
Reference39 articles.
1. Alkan, F., Erdem, E.: A study on developing candidate teachers’ spatial visualization and graphing abilities. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 15, 3446–3450 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.316
2. Amir, M.F., Fediyanto, N., Rudyanto, H.E., Afifah, D.S.N., Tortop, H.S.: Elementary students’ perceptions of 3Dmetric: a cross-sectional study. Heliyon 6(6), e04052 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04052
3. Bosnyák, Á., Nagy-Kondor, R.: The spatial ability and spatial geometrical knowledge of university students majored in mathematics. Acta Didactica Univ. Comenianae 8, 1–25. https://www.ddm.fmph.uniba.sk/ADUC/files/Issue8/01Bosnyak-Nagy.pdf (2008). Accessed 30 Dec 2020
4. Buckley, J., Seery, N., Canty, D.: A heuristic framework of spatial ability: a review and synthesis of spatial factor literature to support its translation into STEM education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 30(3), 947–972 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9432-z
5. CEEB Special Aptitude Test in Spatial Relations: Developed by the College Entrance Examination Board, USA (1939)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献