The need for documenting validation transactions: a qualitative component of the testing validation process-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The need for documenting validation transactions: a qualitative component of the testing validation process

Published:2011-03-04 Issue:6 Volume:45 Page:1303-1311
ISSN:0033-5177
Container-title:Quality & Quantity
language:en
Short-container-title:Qual Quant

Author:

Secolsky Charles,Wentland Ellen,Denison Brian

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Statistics and Probability

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11135-011-9457-6.pdf

Reference43 articles.

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education: Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington (1999)

2. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, National Council on Measurement in Education: Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington (1985)

3. Bhola D.S., Impara J.C., Buckendahl C.W.: Aligning tests with states’ content standards: Methods and issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 22(3), 21–29 (2003)

4. Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81–105 (1959)

5. Chapelle C.A., Enright M.K., Jamieson J.: Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 29(1), 3–13 (2010)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unexpected but Most Welcome;Journal of Mixed Methods Research;2013-05-07