Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature

Author:

Vicente PaulaORCID

Abstract

AbstractAll social media platforms can be used to conduct social science research, but Twitter is the most popular as it provides its data via several Application Programming Interfaces, which allows qualitative and quantitative research to be conducted with its members. As Twitter is a huge universe, both in number of users and amount of data, sampling is generally required when using it for research purposes. Researchers only recently began to question whether tweet-level sampling—in which the tweet is the sampling unit—should be replaced by user-level sampling—in which the user is the sampling unit. The major rationale for this shift is that tweet-level sampling does not consider the fact that some core discussants on Twitter are much more active tweeters than other less active users, thus causing a sample biased towards the more active users. The knowledge on how to select representative samples of users in the Twitterverse is still insufficient despite its relevance for reliable and valid research outcomes. This paper contributes to this topic by presenting a systematic quantitative literature review of sampling plans designed and executed in the context of social science research in Twitter, including: (1) the definition of the target populations, (2) the sampling frames used to support sample selection, (3) the sampling methods used to obtain samples of Twitter users, (4) how data is collected from Twitter users, (5) the size of the samples, and (6) how research validity is addressed. This review can be a methodological guide for professionals and academics who want to conduct social science research involving Twitter users and the Twitterverse.

Funder

ISCTE – Instituto Universitário

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Statistics and Probability

Reference69 articles.

1. Alothali, E., Zaki, N., Mohamed, E., Ashwal, H.: Detecting social bots on Twitter: a literature review. Int. Conf. Innov. Inf. Technol. (IIT) 2018, 175–180 (2018)

2. Amaya, A., Biemer, P., Kinyon, D.: Total error in a big data world: adapting the TSE framework to big data. J. Surv. Stat. Methodol. 8(1), 89–119 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz056

3. Anderson, C.: The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Mag, 16(7). Available at: http://statlit.org/pdf/2008EndOfTheory-DataDelugeMakesScientificMethodObsolete-WiredMagazine.pdf. Accessed 20th Sept 2022. (2008)

4. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Electronic survey methodology: a case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16(2), 185–210 (2003)

5. Babbie, E.: The Basics of Social Research, 7th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston (2017)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3