Abstract
AbstractAll social media platforms can be used to conduct social science research, but Twitter is the most popular as it provides its data via several Application Programming Interfaces, which allows qualitative and quantitative research to be conducted with its members. As Twitter is a huge universe, both in number of users and amount of data, sampling is generally required when using it for research purposes. Researchers only recently began to question whether tweet-level sampling—in which the tweet is the sampling unit—should be replaced by user-level sampling—in which the user is the sampling unit. The major rationale for this shift is that tweet-level sampling does not consider the fact that some core discussants on Twitter are much more active tweeters than other less active users, thus causing a sample biased towards the more active users. The knowledge on how to select representative samples of users in the Twitterverse is still insufficient despite its relevance for reliable and valid research outcomes. This paper contributes to this topic by presenting a systematic quantitative literature review of sampling plans designed and executed in the context of social science research in Twitter, including: (1) the definition of the target populations, (2) the sampling frames used to support sample selection, (3) the sampling methods used to obtain samples of Twitter users, (4) how data is collected from Twitter users, (5) the size of the samples, and (6) how research validity is addressed. This review can be a methodological guide for professionals and academics who want to conduct social science research involving Twitter users and the Twitterverse.
Funder
ISCTE – Instituto Universitário
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Statistics and Probability
Reference69 articles.
1. Alothali, E., Zaki, N., Mohamed, E., Ashwal, H.: Detecting social bots on Twitter: a literature review. Int. Conf. Innov. Inf. Technol. (IIT) 2018, 175–180 (2018)
2. Amaya, A., Biemer, P., Kinyon, D.: Total error in a big data world: adapting the TSE framework to big data. J. Surv. Stat. Methodol. 8(1), 89–119 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz056
3. Anderson, C.: The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Mag, 16(7). Available at: http://statlit.org/pdf/2008EndOfTheory-DataDelugeMakesScientificMethodObsolete-WiredMagazine.pdf. Accessed 20th Sept 2022. (2008)
4. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Electronic survey methodology: a case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16(2), 185–210 (2003)
5. Babbie, E.: The Basics of Social Research, 7th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston (2017)
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献