Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we introduce and test a framework to qualitatively assess the environmental impact of climate adaptation innovations with the ambition to facilitate the implementation of these adaptations. The framework was designed to enable continuous environmentally conscious benchmarking based on three environmental performance indicators: sustainable design, environmental impact and ecological impact. It was pilot tested by uninvolved experts and key-persons for two large-scale nature-based flood adaptation innovations in the Netherlands and discussed with environmental assessment professionals. Our findings indicate how the inclusion of our framework helps to identify important knowledge gaps regarding environmental co-benefits and trade-offs, and can be beneficial to both those developing the innovation and the local authorities charged with assessing the suitability of innovations. We conclude by noting how the incorporation of environmental impact assessment from the design stage of adaptations could supplement existing environmental assessment regulations pre-empting concerns rather than reacting to them.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Geography, Planning and Development,General Medicine
Reference71 articles.
1. Abeysinghe, A., B.M. Dambacher, and R. Byrnes. 2017. National adaptation plans: Understanding mandates and sharing experiences. London: IIED.
2. Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, M.E., and J.M. Smith. 2014. wave attenuation by flexible, idealized salt marsh vegetation. Coastal Engineering 83: 82–92.
4. Baker, J., W.R. Sheate, P. Phillips, and R. Eales. 2013. Ecosystem services in environmental assessment—Help or hindrance? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 40: 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004.
5. Bakker, J.P., J. Bunje, K.S. Dijkema, J. Frikke, N. Hecker, A.S. Kers, P. Körber, J. Kohlus, et al. 2005. 7. Salt marshes. In: Wadden sea ecosystem, vol. 19, ed. Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group. Wilhelmshaven: Common Wadden Sea Secretariat.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献