Abstract
AbstractThe contours of the collective action necessary to limit climate change remain difficult to discern. In this context, societal corporatist political processes, fueled by crisis narratives, have shown some promise as political devices for mobilizing people. Corporatist processes have, historically, brought political competitors like employers and labor unions together to negotiate compacts that have advanced collective goods during times of crisis. In response to the climate crisis in the Global South, affluent donor groups, state officials, some farmers, and indigenous peoples have begun to assemble corporatist-like coalitions to pursue climate stabilization. A comparative case study of efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching through the spread of silvopastoral landscapes in Colombia and Ecuador illustrates this political dynamic, its shortcomings, and its accomplishments.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Barahona, A., and M. Baillard. 2015. Ecuador: Livestock Annual. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
2. Bates, D. 2007. The Barbecho Crisis, La Plaga del Banco, and International Migration: Structural Adjustment in Ecuador’s Southern Amazon. Latin American Perspectives 34: 108–122.
3. Dahl, R. 1978. Pluralism Revisited. Comparative Politics 10: 191–203.
4. Durkheim, E. 1897. The Division of Labour in Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
5. Fisher, D., O. Berglund, and C. Davis. 2023. How Effective are Climate Protests at Swaying Policy and What Could Make a Difference? Nature 623: 910–913.