Discourse developments within the public agenda on Danish nature management 2016–2021: Animal welfare ethics as a barrier to rewilding projects

Author:

Christensen Roland Vestergaard Kragh,Bentsen Niclas ScottORCID

Abstract

AbstractPrompted by the increasing public focus on environmental policy and the continuous inability of States to reach environmental targets agreed upon in the context of the United Nations and the European Union, we explore the development of discourses within the Danish public agenda regarding nature management 2016–2021. This is done through a mixed-methods framework of discourse analysis and structural topic modeling based on documents from the Danish Parliament’s Environmental committee 2016–2021, estimating topic prevalence, and analyzing the discourses within each topic, resulting in a qualitative overview of 21 identified topics and their associated discourses and an overview of how the different topic proportions changed over time. A shift in the public agenda was found: a change from discussions about untouched forest focused on trade-offs between timber extraction and biodiversity, to a discussion about different understandings of animal welfare in the context of large grazers in nature national parks in Denmark.

Funder

Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Geography, Planning and Development,General Medicine

Reference64 articles.

1. Albæk, E., and C.H. de Vreese. 2010. Forskning i politisk kommunikation: Et overblik. Politica 2010: 279–293.

2. Anderson, M. 2011. National Environmental Policy Act (1969). Berkshire Encyclopedia of Sustainability. 3: 393–395.

3. Aranda, A.M., K. Sele, H. Etchanchu, J.Y. Guyt, and E. Vaara. 2021. From big data to rich theory: Integrating critical discourse analysis with structural topic modeling. European Management Review 18: 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12452.

4. Arthur, B.H. 1993. A commentary on the convention on the biological diversity. LLM research paper environment. Law Faculty Victoria University of Wellington.

5. Blach-Ørsten, M., M.K. Eberholst, J.M. Hartley, and M.T. Steensberg. 2020. En ny dagsorden? In Valgkampen 2019 i nyhedsmedierne. #FV19 Politiske kommunikation på digitale medier, ed. I.T. Gulbrandsen and S.N. Just, 69–89. Samfundslitteratur

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3