Abstract
AbstractIllegal killing of wildlife is challenging conservation efforts worldwide. Ecological research has shown that illegal killing is severely affecting the transboundary Swedish-Norwegian wolf population. A previous study indicated that unwillingness to report illegal killing of wolves among Swedish hunters contains an element of protest against perceived unjust treatment of hunting and hunters but that it could also simply be a reflection of ineffective law enforcement in the backcountry, driving hunters to effect forms of self-policing. Based on a survey of Norwegian hunters, the present research goes one step further. One in five hunters decline to report illegal wolf killings, and unwillingness to report is predicted by lack of trust in environmental institutions and a general anti-elite sentiment. Hunting-related issues and other factors also affect outcomes, but to a lesser degree. We conclude that unwillingness to report is often part of an oppositional stance related not only to wildlife management and conservation, but to contemporary social change in rural areas and perceived societal power relations. It is unlikely that reluctance to report is driven by frustration over inefficient official enforcement. While a political dimension is not always articulated, overlooking it may stoke conflicts and fortify a perception of unjust power relations.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd
Norwegian institute for nature research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Geography, Planning and Development,General Medicine
Reference49 articles.
1. Arts, I., A.E. Buijs, and G. Verschoor. 2018. Regimes of justification: Competing arguments and the construction of legitimacy in Dutch nature conservation practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61: 1070–1084.
2. Ballesteros, H.M., G. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, F.J. Ferreiro-Seoane, and H. Martínez-Cabrera. 2020. The fewer insider poachers, the more normative compliance: Clues for managing poaching in the shellfish sector. Deviant Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1854635.
3. Bisi, J., and S. Kurki. 2008. The wolf debate in Finland expectations and objectives for the management of the wolf population at regional and national level. Seinäjoki: University of Helsinki.
4. Borgström, S. 2012. Legitimacy issues in Finnish wolf conservation. Journal of Environmental Law 24: 451–476.
5. Brownlow, A. 2000. A wolf in the garden: Ideology and change in the Adirondack landscape. In Animal Spaces, Beastly Places, ed. C. Philo and C. Wilbert. New York: Routledge.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献