Abstract
AbstractHalting forest loss and achieving sustainable development in an equitable manner require state, non-state actors, and entire societies in the Global North and South to tackle deeply established patterns of inequality and power relations embedded in forest frontiers. Forest and climate governance in the Global South can provide an avenue for the transformational change needed—yet, does it? We analyse the politics and power in four cases of mitigation, adaptation, and development arenas. We use a political economy lens to explore the transformations taking place when climate policy meets specific forest frontiers in the Global South, where international, national and local institutions, interests, ideas, and information are at play. We argue that lasting and equitable outcomes will require a strong discursive shift within dominant institutions and among policy actors to redress policies that place responsibilities and burdens on local people in the Global South, while benefits from deforestation and maladaptation are taken elsewhere. What is missing is a shared transformational objective and priority to keep forests standing among all those involved from afar in the major forest frontiers in the tropics.
Funder
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
Centre for International Forestry Research
Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, University of Leeds
Economic and Social Research Council
Volkswagen Foundation
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Geography, Planning and Development,General Medicine
Reference108 articles.
1. Assembe-Mvondo, S., M. Brockhaus, and G. Lescuyer. 2013. Assessment of the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of benefit-sharing schemes under large-scale agriculture: Lessons from land fees in Cameroon. European Journal of Development Research 25: 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.27.
2. Assembe-Mvondo, S., C.J.P. Colfer, M. Brockhaus, and R. Tsanga. 2014. Review of the legal ownership status of national lands in Cameroon: A more nuanced view. Development Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.927739.
3. Astuti, R. 2021. Governing the ungovernable: The politics of disciplining pulpwood and palm oil plantations in Indonesia’s tropical peatland. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.004.
4. Barnett, J. 2020. Global environmental change II: Political economies of vulnerability to climate change. Progress in Human Geography 44: 1172–1184.
5. Barr, C., A. Dermawan, H. Purnomo, and H. Komarudin. 2010. Financial governance and Indonesia’s Reforestation Fund during the Soeharto and post-Soeharto periods, 1989–2009: A political economic analysis of lessons for REDD+, vol. 52. Bogor: CIFOR.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献