The problem of constitutional legitimation: what the debate on electoral quotas tells us about the legitimacy of decision-making rules in constitutional choice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The problem of constitutional legitimation: what the debate on electoral quotas tells us about the legitimacy of decision-making rules in constitutional choice

Published:2017-01-18 Issue:2 Volume:28 Page:195-208
ISSN:1043-4062
Container-title:Constitutional Political Economy
language:en
Short-container-title:Const Polit Econ

Author:

Trantidis Aris^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10602-016-9233-7.pdf

Reference75 articles.

1. Bacchi, Carol Lee. (2006). Arguing for and against quotas: Theoretical issues. In Drude Dahlerup (Ed.), Women, quotas and politics (pp. 32–51). London/New York: Routledge.

2. Baldez, Lisa. (2006). The Pros and cons of gender quota laws: What happens when you kick men out and let women in? Politics and Gender, 2, 102–109.

3. Baltrunaite, Audinga, Bello, Piero, Casarico, Alessandra, & Profeta, Paola. (2012). Gender quotas and the quality of politicians. Mimeo: Bocconi University.

4. Besley, Timothy, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, & Rickne, Johanna. (2012). Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man. Mimeo: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

5. Boyle, Christine. (1983). Home-rule for women: Power-sharing between men and women. Dalhousie Law Journal, 7, 790–809.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is Public Ignorance a Problem? An Epistemic Defense of Really Existing Democracies;Political Research Quarterly;2024-04-09