Author:
Filippetti Andrea,Rondinella Sandro,Tuzi Fabrizio
Abstract
AbstractThis paper employs a quantitative analysis of the disputes between central and regional government concerning the role of the Italian Constitutional Court, focusing on the context of decentralization initiated during the late 1990s. The econometric evidence demonstrates a significant decrease in favourable outcomes for regional governments following the process of recentralization, which was commenced by central government in 2011 in response to a major financial crisis. The results of this study support the perspective of a centralistic attitude of the courts in litigation concerning subnational governments and provide fresh insights into the role of the courts in the relationship between recentralization and major economic crises.
Funder
Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Albanese, A. (2015). Il modello sociale costituzionale e la sua attuazione in tempo di crisi. Questione Giustizia, 3, 94-105. Retrieved February 1, 2023, from https://www.questionegiustizia.it/data/rivista/articoli/249/qg_2015-3_12.pdf
2. Arban, E. (2015). Re-centralizing subsidiarity: Interpretations by the Italian constitutional court. Regional & Federal Studies, 25, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2014.943736
3. Aroney, N., & Kincaid, J. (2017). Introduction: courts in federal countries. In N. Aroney & J. Kincaid (Eds.), Courts in federal countries, federalists or unitarists? (pp. 3–28). University of Toronto Press.
4. Baun, M., & Marek, D. (2006). Regional policy and decentralization in the Czech Republic. Regional & Federal Studies, 16, 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560600989011
5. Bolgherini, S. (2014). Can austerity lead to recentralisation? Italian local government during the economic crisis. South European Society and Politics, 19, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.895086