Welfare without rent seeking? Buchanan’s demogrant proposal and the possibility of a constitutional welfare state

Author:

Lehto Otto,Meadowcroft JohnORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn a number of works, James M. Buchanan set out a proposal for a ‘demogrant’—a form of universal basic income that applied the principles of generality and non discrimination to the tax and the transfer sides of the scheme and was to be implemented as a constitutional rule outside the realm of day-to-day politics. The demogrant has received surprisingly little scholarly attention, but this article locates it in Buchanan’s broader constitutional political economy project and shows it was a logical application of his theoretical framework to the problem of inefficient and unfair welfare systems when reform to the basic institutions of majoritarian democracy was not forthcoming. The demogrant aims to end the problems of majority cycling and rent seeking that plague contemporary welfare states and therefore offers a model of welfare without rent seeking—a constitutional welfare state. We compare Buchanan’s demogrant model to other universal basic income and negative income tax models and consider the most important criticisms. We conclude that rescuing the demogrant model from relative obscurity would be a fruitful future task of applied constitutional political economy and public choice.

Funder

Centre for the Study of Governance and Society, King's College London

King's College London

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science

Reference73 articles.

1. Alston, P., Sir (2018). Statement on visit to the United Kingdom, by professor philip alston, United Nations special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. London, 16 November 2018.

2. Berggren, N. (2000). Implementing generality while reducing the risk for fiscal explosion. Constitutional Political Economy, 11(4), 353–369.

3. Bergh, A. (2007). The middle class and the Swedish welfare state: How not to measure redistribution. The Independent Review, 11(4), 533–546.

4. Boettke, P. J., & Martin, A. (2012). Taking the “G” out of BIG: A comparative political economy perspective on basic income. Basic Income Studies, 6(2), 1–18.

5. Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2019). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. In S. R. Chakravarty (Ed.), Poverty, social exclusion and stochastic dominance. Singapore: Springer.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3