1. For an appraisal of social goals to be sought in city planning see Harvey S. Perloff, “New Directions in Social Planning,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners, XXXI, No. 4, (November, 1965), p. 299.
2. For discussion of interindustry models see W. W. Leontief,The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1939 (2nd ed.; New York: Oxford University Press, 1951); Hollis B. Chenery and Paul G. Clark,Interindustry Economics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1959); W. Duane Evans and Marvin Hoffenberg, “The Interindustry Relations Study for 1947,”Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXIV, No. 2, (May, 1952), pp. 97–142; William H. Miernyk,The Elements of Input-Output Analysis, (New York: Random House, 1965). For discussion of regional interindustry models see Walter Isardet al, Methods of Regional Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1960), chap. 8; Werner Hochwald, Herbert E. Striner, and Sidney Sonenblum,Local Impact of Foreign Trade (Washington, D.C.: National Planning Association, 1960); Roland Artle,Studies in the Structure of the Stockholm Economy, (Stockholm: Business Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, 1959); andThe Impact of Space and Space-Related Activities on a Local Economy (Boulder: Bureau of Economic Research, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, July, 1965); NASA Research Grant No. NSG-474, Part I, “The Input-Output Analysis,” by William H. Miernyk, Ernest R. Bonner, John H. Chapman, Jr., and Kenneth Shellhammer; Part II, “The Income-Product Accounts,” by Don Seastone, Ernest R. Bonner, Charles M. Franks, and William McCormick. For a critique of the interindustry approach see Charles M. Tiebout, “Regional and Interregional Input-Output Models: An Appraisal,”The Southern Economic Journal, XXIV, No. 2, (October, 1957), pp. 140–47.
3. In matrix notation, [X]=[I−a]−1. [Y], see Appendix I. Dynamic properties over time can be observed by appropriate time phasing of entries in the capital formation column. Conceptually, the model can be made dynamic through use of capital coefficients but data deficiencies and other problems have prevented the development of fully operational dynamic intersectoral models. See Richard M. Goodwin, “The Multiplier as Matrix,”Economic Journal, LIX, No. 236 (December, 1949), pp. 237–55; Wassily W. Leontief, “Dynamic Analysis,”Studies in the Structure of the American Economy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1953), pp. 53–90; Robert N. Grosse, “The Structure of Capital,”ibid, pp. 185–242; R. Dorfman, P. Samuelson, and R. Solow,Linear Programming and Economic Analysis (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1958), chaps. 11, 12; and Hollis B. Chenery and Paul G. Clark,Interindustry Economics (New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1959), pp. 71–80.
4. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and American Institute of Planners;Walter Isard,1957
5. Elements of Regional Accounts,1964