Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study

Author:

Gill HarminderORCID,Fernandes Joao Filipe,Nio Amanda,Dockerill Cameron,Shah Nili,Ahmed Naajia,Raymond Jason,Wang Shu,Sotelo Julio,Urbina Jesus,Uribe Sergio,Rajani Ronak,Rhode Kawal,Lamata Pablo

Abstract

AbstractAortic stenosis is a condition which is fatal if left untreated. Novel quantitative imaging techniques which better characterise transvalvular pressure drops are being developed but require refinement and validation. A customisable and cost-effective workbench valve phantom circuit capable of replicating valve mechanics and pathology was created. The reproducibility and relationship of differing haemodynamic metrics were assessed from ground truth pressure data alongside imaging compatibility. The phantom met the requirements to capture ground truth pressure data alongside ultrasound and magnetic resonance image compatibility. The reproducibility was successfully tested. The robustness of three different pressure drop metrics was assessed: whilst the peak and net pressure drops provide a robust assessment of the stenotic burden in our phantom, the peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that is confounded by non-valvular factors such as wave reflection. The peak-to-peak pressure drop is a metric that should be reconsidered in clinical practice. Graphical abstract The left panel shows manufacture of low cost, functional valves. The central section demonstrates circuit layout, representative MRI and US images alongside gross valve morphologies. The right panel shows the different pressure drop metrics that were assessed for reproducibility

Funder

British Heart Foundation

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Wellcome Trust

Núcleo Milenio Información y Coordinación en Redes, ICR

Iniciación en Investigación

Medical Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pharmaceutical Science,Genetics,Molecular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3