Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Nishi H, Miyata H, Motomura N, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database. Surg Today. 2015;45:1144–52.
2. Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, Markewitz A, Blaßfeld D, Böning A. German heart surgery report 2022: the annual updated registry of the German society for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;71:340–55.
3. Nissen AP, Miller CC 3rd, Thourani VH, Woo YJ, Gammie JS, Ailawadi G, et al. Less invasive mitral surgery versus conventional sternotomy stratified by mitral pathology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:819–27.
4. Tang P, Onaitis M, Gaca JG, Milano CA, Stafford-Smith M, Glower D. Right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve surgery: a propensity matched study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(2):575–81.
5. Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, Diegeler A, Folliguet TA, Nifong LW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations. 2011;6:66–7.