Author:
Berenbrink Petra,Hoefer Martin,Kaaser Dominik,Lenzner Pascal,Rau Malin,Schmand Daniel
Abstract
AbstractOpinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. A prominent model to study opinion formation processes is due to Hegselmann and Krause. It has the distinguishing feature that stable states do not necessarily show consensus, i.e., the population of agents might not agree on the same opinion. We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann–Krause model. There are n agents, which are connected by a social network. Their opinions evolve in an iterative, asynchronous process, in which agents are activated one after another at random. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion (where similarity of opinions is defined using a parameter $$\varepsilon $$
ε
). Thus, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. We show that such opinion dynamics are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $${\text {O}}(n|E|^2 (\varepsilon /\delta )^2)$$
O
(
n
|
E
|
2
(
ε
/
δ
)
2
)
on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence to a stable state, where $$|E|$$
|
E
|
is the number of edges of the social network, and $$\delta $$
δ
is a parameter of the stability concept. For the complete social network we show a bound of $${\text {O}}(n^3(n^2 + (\varepsilon /\delta )^2))$$
O
(
n
3
(
n
2
+
(
ε
/
δ
)
2
)
)
that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $${\text {O}}(n^9 (\varepsilon /\delta )^2)$$
O
(
n
9
(
ε
/
δ
)
2
)
.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,Germany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Abelson, R., Bernstein, A.: A computer simulation model of community referendum controversies. Public Opin. Q. 27(1), 93–122 (1963)
2. Anagnostopoulos, A., Becchetti, L., Cruciani, E., Pasquale, F., Rizzo, S.: Biased opinion dynamics: when the devil is in the details. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 53–59
3. Angluin, D., Aspnes, J., Eisenstat, D.: A simple population protocol for fast robust approximate majority. Distrib. Comput. 21(2), 87–102 (2008)
4. Auletta, V., Fanelli, A., Ferraioli, D.: Consensus in opinion formation processes in fully evolving environments. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 6022–6029 (2019)
5. Bankhamer, G., Berenbrink, P., Biermeier, F., Elsässer, R., Hosseinpour, H., Kaaser, D., Kling, P.: Fast consensus via the unconstrained undecided state dynamics. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 3417–3429 (2022)