International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
-
Published:2023-05-23
Issue:8
Volume:32
Page:2155-2163
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Brady Keri J. S.ORCID, Peipert John DevinORCID, Atkinson Thomas M.ORCID, Pompili CeciliaORCID, Pinto MonicaORCID, Shaw James W.ORCID, Roydhouse JessicaORCID,
Abstract
AbstractIn June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related considerations for instrument selection and trial design in registrational cancer clinical trials, building on prior communications about the use of PROs to assess efficacy and tolerability in oncology drug development. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Standards and Best Practices Committee led an initiative to draft a commentary about the guidance, focusing on its positive aspects and areas that would benefit from additional clarification and consideration. For comprehensiveness, the authors reviewed existing public comments on the draft guidance, and the commentary underwent a thorough review process through three ISOQOL Special Interest Groups (Psychometrics, Clinical Practice, and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement) followed by the ISOQOL Board. The goal of this commentary is to situate this new and relevant guidance document within the context of recent regulatory efforts on PROs and highlight areas in which further work may ultimately benefit the field.
Funder
Select Foundation National Institutes of Health University of Tasmania
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference54 articles.
1. US Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 17 January 2023, from https://www.fda.gov/media/77832/download 2. Bruner, D. W., Hanisch, L. J., Reeve, B. B., Trotti, A. M., Schrag, D., Sit, L., Mendoza, T. R., Minasian, L., O’Mara, A., Denicoff, A. M., Rowland, J. H., Montello, M., Geoghegan, C., Abernethy, A. P., Clauser, S. B., Castro, K., Mitchell, S. A., Burke, L., Trentacosti, A. M., & Basch, E. M. (2011). Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Translational Behavioral Medicine, 1(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0025-3 3. Basch, E. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—Harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1611252 4. Giesinger, J. M., Efficace, F., Aaronson, N., Calvert, M., Kyte, D., Cottone, F., Cella, D., & Gamper, E. M. (2021). Past and current practice of patient-reported outcome measurement in randomized cancer clinical trials: A systematic review. Value Health, 24(4), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.004 5. European Medicines Agency. (2016). Appendix 2 to the guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. European Medicines Agency. Retrieved 17 January 2023, from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/appendix-2-guideline-evaluation-anticancer-medicinal-products-man_en.pdf
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|