Mapping Kansas City cardiomyopathy, Seattle Angina, and minnesota living with heart failure to the MacNew-7D in patients with heart disease
-
Published:2024-06-05
Issue:8
Volume:33
Page:2151-2163
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Senanayake SameeraORCID, Uchil Rithika, Sharma PakhiORCID, Parsonage WilliamORCID, Kularatna SanjeewaORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) are widely used non-preference-based instruments that measure health-related quality of life (QOL) in people with heart disease. However, currently it is not possible to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for economic evaluation using these instruments as the summary scores produced are not preference-based. The MacNew-7D is a heart disease-specific preference-based instrument. This study provides different mapping algorithms for allocating utility scores to KCCQ, MLHFQ, and SAQ from MacNew-7D to calculate QALYs for economic evaluations.
Methods
The study included 493 participants with heart failure or angina who completed the KCCQ, MLHFQ, SAQ, and MacNew-7D questionnaires. Regression techniques, namely, Gamma Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Bayesian GLM, Linear regression with stepwise selection and Random Forest were used to develop direct mapping algorithms. Cross-validation was employed due to the absence of an external validation dataset. The study followed the Mapping onto Preference-based measures reporting Standards checklist.
Results
The best models to predict MacNew-7D utility scores were determined using KCCQ, MLHFQ, and SAQ item and domain scores. Random Forest performed well for item scores for all questionnaires and domain score for KCCQ, while Bayesian GLM and Linear Regression were best for MLHFQ and SAQ domain scores. However, models tended to over-predict severe health states.
Conclusion
The three cardiac-specific non-preference-based QOL instruments can be mapped onto MacNew-7D utilities with good predictive accuracy using both direct response mapping techniques. The reported mapping algorithms may facilitate estimation of health utility for economic evaluations that have used these QOL instruments.
Funder
Queensland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Dalziel, K., Segal, L., & Mortimer, D. (2008). Review of Australian health economic evaluation – 245 interventions: What can we say about cost effectiveness? Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 6(1), 9. 2. Collado-Mateo, D., Chen, G., Garcia-Gordillo, M. A., Iezzi, A., Adsuar, J. C., Olivares, P. R., & Gusi, N. (2017). Fibromyalgia and quality of life: Mapping the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire to the preference-based instruments. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 114. 3. Prieto, L., & Sacristán, J. A. (2003). Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 80. 4. Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., & Khan, M. A. (2015). Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: The relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and ‘micro-utility’ effects. Quality of life Research: An International Journal of Quality of life Aspects of Treatment care and Rehabilitation, 24(8), 2045–2053. 5. Wells, G. A., Russell, A. S., Haraoui, B., Bissonnette, R., & Ware, C. F. (2011). Validity of quality of Life Measurement Tools — from generic to Disease-specific. The Journal of Rheumatology, 88, 2.
|
|