A qualitative study to examine meaningful change in physical function associated with weight-loss

Author:

Poon Jiat-LingORCID,Marshall ChrisORCID,Johnson ChloeORCID,Pegram Hannah C.ORCID,Hunter Maile,Kan HongjunORCID,Ahmad Nadia N.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study explored perceptions of meaningful weight-loss and the level of change on two patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, the 36-item Short Form Health Survey® [SF-36v2®] and Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Lite-Clinical Trials© [IWQOL-Lite-CT©], that individuals living with overweight or obesity consider to be meaningful and indicative of treatment success. Methods Thirty-three qualitative interviews were conducted in the US with adults living with overweight or obesity. Concept elicitation explored perceptions of minimally important/meaningful weight-loss using open-ended questions. Cognitive debriefing was used to understand thresholds for meaningful change on both measures. Results Most participants (n = 23/33) expected a 5% total body weight-loss to yield some benefit in physical functioning, while all participants expected a 10% weight-loss to provide a meaningful and noticeable improvement in their physical functioning. Participants indicated that an item-level 1-point score change on each measure would represent a noticeable improvement in physical functioning and indicate treatment success. Conclusions Participants expected moderate weight-losses to be noticeable, with ≥ 10% weight-loss yielding the most consistent results. The findings suggested that both measures provide strong opportunity to demonstrate treatment benefit in relation to physical functioning as a small change on the response scale would represent a noticeable improvement in participants’ daily lives.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference34 articles.

1. Chooi, Y. C., Ding, C., & Magkos, F. (2019). The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental., 92, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005

2. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). (2015). Global burden of disease study 2015—Risk factor results 1990–2015. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2015-risk-factor-results-1990-2015. Retrieved 31 Mar 2021.

3. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Obesity and overweight: Key facts. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Retrieved 31 Mar 2021.

4. Bhaskaran, K., Douglas, I., Forbes, H., dos-Santos-Silva, I., Leon, D. A., & Smeeth, L. (2014). Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: A population-based cohort study of 5·24 million UK adults. The Lancet (London, England), 384(9945), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60892-8

5. Khaodhiar, L., McCowen, K., & Blackburn, G. (1999). Obesity and its comorbid conditions. Clinical Cornerstone, 2(3), 17–31.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3