Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric solid organ transplantation: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation through qualitative description
-
Published:2021-01-14
Issue:5
Volume:30
Page:1355-1364
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Anthony Samantha J.ORCID, Young Katarina, Pol Sarah J.ORCID, Selkirk Enid K.ORCID, Blydt-Hansen Tom, Boucher Suzanne, Goldberg Aviva, Hamiwka Lorraine, Haverman LotteORCID, Mitchell Joanna, Urschel Simon, Santana Maria, Stinson Jennifer, Sutherland Katie, West Lori J.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments used to collect data about the subjective assessment of medical care from the patient perspective. Implementing PROMs within pediatric clinical settings has gained increasing importance as health services prioritize patient-centred pediatric care. This study explores the perspectives of pediatric solid organ transplant patients, caregivers, and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) on implementing PROMs into clinical practice.
Methods
Qualitative description methods were used to elicit stakeholder perspectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted across five Canadian transplant centres. Purposive sampling was used to obtain maximum variation across age, gender, and transplant program for all participants, as well as discipline for HCPs.
Results
The study included a total of 63 participants [patients (n = 20), caregivers (n = 22) and HCPs (n = 21)]. Nearly all participants endorsed the implementation of PROMs to enhance pediatric transplant clinical care. Three primary roles for PROMs emerged: (1) to bring a transplant patient’s overall well-being into the clinical care conversation; (2) to improve patient communication and engagement; and, (3) to inform the practice of clinical pediatric transplant care. Insights for effective implementation included completing electronic PROMs remotely and prior to clinical appointments by patients who are eight to 10 years of age or older.
Conclusions
This study contributes to current research that supports the use of PROMs in clinical pediatric care and guides their effective implementation into practice. Future directions include the development, usability testing, and evaluation of a proposed electronic PROM platform that will inform future research initiatives.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Hospital for Sick Children
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference56 articles.
1. Bevans, K. B., Moon, J., Carle, A. C., Mara, C. A., Lai, J.-S., DiMarco, L., et al. (2014). Patient reported outcomes as indicators of pediatric health care quality. Academic Pediatrics, 14(5), S90–S96. 2. Bitton, A., Onega, T., Tosteson, A. N., & Haas, J. S. (2014). Toward a better understanding of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. The American Journal of Managed Care, 20(4), 281–283. 3. Cleemput, I., & Dobbels, F. (2007). Measuring patient-reported outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients. Pharmacoeconomics, 25(4), 269–286. 4. Haywood, K., Brett, J., Salek, S., Marlett, N., Penman, C., Shklarov, S., et al. (2015). Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: What is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1069–1076. 5. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register, 74(235), 65132–65133.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|