Patient adherence to patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion in clinical care: current understanding and future recommendations
-
Published:2023-09-11
Issue:1
Volume:33
Page:281-290
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Unni Elizabeth, Coles Theresa, Lavallee Danielle C., Freel Jennifer, Roberts NatashaORCID, Absolom Kate
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used as an assessment and monitoring tool in clinical practice. However, patient adherence to PROMs completions are typically not well documented or explained in published studies and reports. Through a collaboration between the International Society for Quality-of-Life Research (ISOQOL) Patient Engagement and QOL in Clinical Practice Special Interest Groups (SIGs) case studies were collated as a platform to explore how adherence can be evaluated and understood. Case studies were drawn from across a range of clinically and methodologically diverse PROMs activities.
Results
The case studies identified that the influences on PROMs adherence vary. Key drivers include PROMs administeration methods within a service and wider system, patient capacity to engage and clinician engagement with PROMs information. It was identified that it is important to evaluate PROMs integration and adherence from multiple perspectives.
Conclusion
PROM completion rates are an important indicator of patient adherence. Future research prioritizing an understanding of PROMs completion rates by patients is needed.
Funder
Health Technology Assessment Programme The University of Queensland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference37 articles.
1. Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Dueck, A. C., Scher, H. I., Kris, M. G., Hudis, C., & Schrag, D. (2017). Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA, 318(2), 197–198. 2. Guo, T., Xiang, Y.-T., Xiao, L., Hu, C.-Q., Chiu, H. F. K., Ungvari, G. S., Correll, C. U., Lai, K. Y. C., Feng, L., Geng, Y., Feng, Y., & Wang, G. (2015). Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: a randomized controlled trial with blind raters. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(10), 1004–1013. 3. Kraegeloh, C. U., Czuba, K. J., Billington, D. R., Kersten, P., & Siegert, R. J. (2015). Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: a scoping study and typology. Psychiatric Services, 66(3), 224–241. 4. Landes, S. J., Carlson, E. B., Ruzek, J. I., Wang, D., Hugo, E., DeGaetano, N., Chambers, J. G., & Lindley, S. E. (2015). Provider-driven development of a measurement feedback system to enhance measurement-based care in VA mental health. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(1), 87–100. 5. Philpot, L. M., Barnes, S. A., Brown, R. M., Austin, J. A., James, C. S., Stanford, R. H., & Ebbert, J. O. (2018). Barriers and benefits to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care: a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Quality, 33(4), 359–364.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|