Measurement properties of utility-based health-related quality of life measures in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs: a systematic review
-
Published:2024-07-03
Issue:9
Volume:33
Page:2299-2320
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Bulamu Norma B.ORCID, Gebremichael Lemlem G.ORCID, Hines SoniaORCID, Mpundu-Kaambwa ChristineORCID, Pearson VincentORCID, Dafny Hila A.ORCID, Pinero de Plaza Maria AlejandraORCID, Beleigoli AllineORCID, Kaambwa BillingsleyORCID, Hendriks Jeroen M.ORCID, Clark Robyn A.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To identify utility-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs (CR) and appraise existing evidence on their measurement properties. Secondly, to link their items to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and the International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures (ICHOM) domains for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Methods
Eight databases were searched. The review followed the COSMIN and JBI guidelines for measurement properties systematic reviews and PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. Non-experimental and observational empirical studies of patients ≥ 18 years of age with CVD undergoing CR and assessed quality of life (QoL) or HRQoL using utility-based PROMs or one accompanied by health state utilities were included.
Results
Nine PROMs were identified with evidence on measurement properties for three measures: the German translations of SF-12, EQ-5D-5L, and MacNew heart disease HRQoL questionnaire. There was moderate quality evidence for responsiveness and hypothesis testing of the SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L, and high-quality evidence for responsiveness and hypothesis testing for the MacNew.
All items of SF-12 and EQ-5D were linked to ICF categories, but four items of the MacNew were not classified or defined. All the PROM domains were mapped onto similar constructs from the ICHOM global sets.
Conclusion
Three utility-based PROMs validated in CR were identified: the German versions of the EQ-5D and SF-12 and the MacNew questionnaire. These PROMs are linked to a breadth of ICF categories and all ICHOM global sets. Additional validation studies of PROMs in CR are required.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. World Health Organization. (1993). Needs and action priorities in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease (p. 6). WHO Regional Office for Europe. 2. Piepoli, M. F., Corra, U., Benzer, W., Bjarnason-Wehrens, B., Dendale, P., Gaita, D., McGee, H., Mendes, M., Niebauer, J., & Zwisler, A.-D.O. (2010). Prevention and rehabilitation. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 17(1), 1–17. 3. Piepoli, M. F., Corrà, U., Adamopoulos, S., Benzer, W., Bjarnason-Wehrens, B., Cupples, M., Dendale, P., Doherty, P., Gaita, D., Höfer, S., McGee, H., Mendes, M., Niebauer, J., Pogosova, N., Garcia-Porrero, E., Rauch, B., Schmid, J. P., & Giannuzzi, P. (2014). Endorsed by the committee for practice guidelines of the european society of cardiology. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 21(6), 664–681. 4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2006). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 79. 5. Abreu, A., Frederix, I., Dendale, P., Janssen, A., Doherty, P., Piepoli, M. F., Völler, H., & Davos, C. H. (2020). Standardization and quality improvement of secondary prevention through cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes in Europe: The avenue towards EAPC accreditation programme: A position statement of the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 28(5), 496–509.
|
|